This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
tomshardware.com
，这一点在im钱包官方下载中也有详细论述
消息称三星电子将停产2DNAND 闪存，原有产线用于1c nm DRAM内存制程
延禧攻略：谷歌遭禁無礙問鼎全球第一熱搜劇2018年12月24日